Check out what we have to say!
  1. The Chaordic Age: crowdsourcing is a balance of chaos and order

    We called our crowdsourcing platform Chaordix as a salute to Dee Hock, the founder/creator and former CEO of the VISA credit card association. He coined the term to describe the dynamic tension he’d set up in Visa: encourage as much competition and initiative as possible throughout the organization — “chaos” — while building in mechanisms for cooperation — “order.”

    When we talk about crowdsourcing, we consider the same principles that Hock considered when creating what would become VISA. These principles are the foundation for any chaordic organization:

    • What if ownership was in the form of irrevocable right of participation, rather than stock: rights that could not be rated, traded, bought, or sold but only acquired through application or acceptance of membership?
    • What if it were self organizing, with participants having the right to self organize at any time, for any reason, at any scale, with irrevocable rights of participation in governance at any greater scale?
    • What if power and function were distributive, with no power vested in or function performed by any part that could reasonably exercised by any more peripheral part?
    • What if governance was distributive, with no individual, institution, or combination of either or both, particularly management, able to dominate deliberations or control decisions at any scale?
    • What if it could seamlessly blend cooperation and competition, with all parts free to compete in unique, independent ways, yet able to yield self interests and cooperate when necessary to the good of the whole?
    • What if it were infinitely malleable, yet extremely durable, with all parts capable of constant, self generated, modification of form or function without sacrificing its essential purpose, nature, or embodied principle, thus releasing human ingenuity and spirit?

    Instead of trying to enforce cooperation by restricting what the members can do, the Visa bylaws encourage them to compete and innovate as much as possible. “Members are free to create, price, market, and service their own products under the Visa name,” he says. “At the same time, in a narrow band of activity essential to the success of the whole, they engage in the most intense cooperation.” This harmonious blend of cooperation and competition is what allowed the system to expand worldwide in the face of different currencies, languages, legal codes, customs, cultures, and political philosophies.

    It’s a shift and one that is easier for some industries over others, but Dee Hock’s message is inspiring. Instead of looking to crowdsourcing as something that is taking away power, look to it as something that is enabling innovation - a complex balance of collaboration and competition bringing us new ideas.

    To read more, pick up Dee Hock’s book, Birth of the Chaordic Age

  2. New Kid on the Crowdsourcing Block

    As one of the newest members to join the Chaordix team, I’m pretty excited to be a) joining such an innovative team and b) writing my very first blog - I know, I know, welcome to 1999, population: me :)

    Also, I’m also pretty thrilled to be entering the realm of Crowdsourcing - which is totally new to me, and what a cool environment to soak it all in. Here are two things I really like about Chaordix:

    1.)   How many companies let ALL their employees do their own blog entries, on topics of their choice? It’s nice to work in a place where all different perspectives are valued.

    2.)   Random facts…I’ve never worked at a company where people know so many random facts. We could play a great game of Trivial Pursuit.

    Over the past few weeks, I have come across some resources (internally and externally) that have helped me wrap my head around what exactly “crowdsourcing” (also referred to by many as “open innovation”) is, and how companies are finding great success through calls to a group of contributors (a crowd) asking for their input.

    I thought it might be helpful to share a couple of the discoveries I’ve had along the way - for any other “newbies” out there - just starting to grasp this concept.

    Not to brag or anything, but our Chaordix website has tons of great resources. Check out the case studies…here you’ll find some examples of how well-known companies have used crowdsourcing, and provides a useful breakdown of their purpose, call, model, incentives, promotion and more. You’ll also learn how we’ve ranked these initiatives based on the elements mentioned above. I found these interesting and useful!

    I’ll be writing more case studies and as I was researching, I came across a little company you might have heard of…Pepsi, and their project, the Pepsi Refresh Project. It’s a pretty great reference in terms of the end user’s perspective. Enjoy!

    Chaordix relies on crowds to strengthen our business too! Whether you are familiar with crowdsourcing or looking to contribute by joining an innovative team, Chaordix offers great opportunities for people looking to be part of something cool.

  3. Jonathan Zittrain - Minds for Sale

    Here at Chaordix, we like listening to smart people. There’s nothing worse than being excited for a conference, only to hear people talk about the same ideas that were discussed the year before. Therefore, we love when we come across someone that really challenges the way we think. So far in 2010, that person is Jonathan Zittrain. He teaches a course co-hosted by Harvard and Stanford law schools titled “Difficult Problems in Cyberlaw,” and wrote a book,  The Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It

    His lectures and posts on Ubiquitous Human Computing (websites like Amazon Mechanical Turk) are thought-provoking and help us think about how everything we are doing has an impact on how we traditionally do work. While we’re dreaming of all of the possibilities of crowdsourcing, it is nice to know that others are thinking about the impact all of those possibilities might bring - and guiding us somewhere positive. Jonathan was kind enough to say we could post his lecture on our blog - and we think you should sit down and watch all 77 minutes as soon as you can.

    *note: if you like this, he’s also talked at TED also - buy the book :)

  4. The Wikipedia Problem

    It’s been noted that over 2009, Wikipedia lost over 49,000 editors. According to a study by Felipe Ortega, from the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid, the year prior saw a loss of only 4,900 editors. What does this mean? Are people losing interest in Wikipedia, one of the top 10 website in the world? Considering most students can no longer write a paper without citing Wikipedia, should we be alarmed? What if Wikipedia dies?

    Wikipedia says it is nowhere near this. They point out that Mr. Ortega raises valid challenges for Wikipedia in the future, but his numbers are off. Details aside, how many editors does Wikipedia need at this point?

    Back in 2001, Wikipedia needed content, but that was years ago. Now, everything you can think of has an entry. Is it possible that we simply don’t need as many editors any more? Perhaps the time has come for experts on different subjects to review and improve the content that is already there.

    Whether there is a decline in editors, or the numbers are holding steady, we don’t see this as a negative sign for Wikipedia, we just think of it as an evolution. At almost ten years old, it is a great example of the wisdom of crowds and how that collective intelligence can be used. It will be interesting to see how the next few years unfold for Wikipedia.

  5. The Odyssey of a girl, a dog and the perfect dev environment

    Developers are a picky bunch. We have a fairly small team, yet we all prefer different development environments. I think it is safe to say that you don’t come between a developer and his workstation, so we all code on the one we like the most.

    As of today, Gentoo[1], Debian, and Ubuntu are all PHP 5.2 based.   Even worse, several of the distributions (dotdeb, Zend) failed to play nicely with the installed environments.   Even when packagers stay current, it’s hard for them to resist twiddling [2] and invariably we end up with subtly different behaviour.   Even the normally stalwart Macs require massaging with MacPorts[3] and are far from free-of-pain.

    We’ve decided the best approach is that we use hand compiled PHP for almost all our devs.  Aside from this being two paragraphs on the state of PHP (and some grumbling about it), I’m curious how other dev shops have dealt with this.  How do other shops manage PHP in mixed development environments?  How has the long night of the PHP 5.3 transition been for you?

    [1] - http://bugs.gentoo.org/274512

    [2] - http://derickrethans.nl/distributions-please-dont-cripple-php-or-red-hat-stop-fucking-around.html

    [3] - http://www.macports.org/

    Photo by: Joey DeVilla